Growth status of preschool children with a view to create a motivational song on growth promotion for preschoolers
Shilpa. S1*, Dilshad Ali2, Jismol Thomas2, Jincy Eldhose2, Fifanciya CJ2, Hafeela CT2, Drisya T K2, Lijina A P2
1Lecturer, Almas College of Nursing, Kerala
2Third Year BSc Nursing Students, Almas College of Nursing, Kerala
*Corresponding Author Email: shilpashine9@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A quantitative approach non experimental descriptive exploratory research design was used for the study. 30 samples from selected anganwadies of Ponmala panchayath were selected by non probability purposive sampling technique. Socio demographic data were assessed using socio-demographic performa. Data were analysed and interpreted by descriptive and inferential statistics. Data collection tool were standardized growth chart, Gomez classification for degree of malnutrition, and structured interview schedule. Results and conclusion: The analysis revealed that, 33.3% preschool children have normal height and 30 % children have severe under height, 30% preschool children have normal weight and 43.33% children have severe under weight, 66.07 % preschool children have normal mid arm circumference and 3.34% children have severe under mid arm circumference, 53.33% preschool children have healthy weight, 30% preschool children have normal nutritional status and 80 % children have moderate malnutrition. There is a significant association between socio-demographic variables with growth status and nutritional status (p value<0.05).
KEYWORDS: Assessment, Growth status, Preschool children, Motivational song.
INTRODUCTION:
Children are gift from the God, they are reward from him. They are the world's most valuable resources and it's best hope for future1. Growth is an essential feature that distinguishes a child from an adult. The process of growth starts from the time conception and continues until the child grows into a fully mature adult. During the early embryonic period of life2. An exponential increase in the number of cells occurs. At the early embryonic stage, Fetal cells divide and differentiate to form tissues and organs in later half of pregnancy and early childhood, there is an additionally an increase in the cell size.
The cell size continues to enlarge until about ten year of age. After that increase in the cell size occurs rather slowly3. Good nutrition help to improve child survival to promote healthy growth and development to contribute to better cognitive and economic development4. To reduce the morbidity and mortality rate and the risk of chronic diseases, cardiovascular disease, DM, kwashiorkor, marasmus, Hypertension. It has often being leading in the qualitative andquantitative point of view regulating in occurrence of malnutrition5.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:
A study to assess the Growth status of preschool children in a selected anganwadies of Ponmala panchayath, in Malappuram with a view to create a motivational song on growth promotion for preschoolers.
OBJECTIVES:
· To assess the growth status of preschool children.
· To assess the nutritional status of preschool children.
· To associate the growth status of preschool children with selected socio-demographic variables.
· To associate the nutritional status of preschool children with selected socio-demographic variables.
· To assess the effect of motivational song on growth promotion of preschool children.
ASSUMPTION:
· The growth status of the preschoolers in the selected community may vary from the WHO standards of growth.
· Singing the motivational song frequently may help to faster food intake and thereby promote nutritional status.
METHODOLOGY:
A quantitative approach non experimental descriptive exploratory research design was choosen for the study. The sample comprised of 30 preschoolers in a selected Anganawadi of Ponmala panchayath, Kerala, India by Non probability purposive sampling technique was used in this study. After taking the consent, Socio demographic data were assessed using socio-demographic performa, Growth status by WHO growth assessment chart for assessing growth status, Degree of malnutrion by Gomez formula. Data was analyzed and interpreted by using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Analysis and interpretation:
Section I–Distribution of socio demographic characteristics of preschool children (n=30)
Figure 1: Percentage distribution of preschool children based on age
Figure 1 shows 3.33 % of preschool children are belongs to the age group of 3 –3.5 years, 33.33 % from the age group of 3.5 – 4 years, 6.67 % preschool children belongs to 4 – 4.5 years and 56.67% children are among the age group of 4.5 – 5 years. (n=30)
Figure 2: Percentage distribution of preschool children based on gender
Figure 2 shows that 50% of the study participants are females and remaining 50% are male.
Table 1 - Frequency and percentage distribution of preschool children based on Type of the family, Income of the family and Occupation of the parents, Type of dietary pattern , Delivery and Birth order of child, number of siblings, duration of breast feeding, weaning started, any previous history of infections or infestations, any behavioral disorders, any other nutritional supplementations. (n = 30)
|
Variable |
Category |
Frequency (f) |
Percentage (%) |
|
Type of the family |
Joint family |
10 |
33.33 % |
|
|
Nuclear family |
20 |
66.67 % |
|
Income of the family |
Below 5000 |
16 |
53.33 % |
|
|
Rs.5001–10000 |
11 |
36.67 % |
|
|
Rs.10001–20000 |
3 |
10 % |
|
Occupation of parents |
Private employee |
25 |
83.33 % |
|
|
Home maker |
5 |
16.67 % |
|
Type of dietary pattern |
Mixed |
30 |
100% |
|
Delivery |
Preterm |
3 |
10 % |
|
|
Term |
27 |
90 % |
|
Birth order of child |
First |
9 |
30 % |
|
|
Second |
5 |
16.67 % |
|
|
Third |
11 |
36.67 % |
|
|
Forth and above |
5 |
16.67 % |
|
Number of siblings |
1 |
10 |
33.33 % |
|
|
2 |
7 |
23.33 % |
|
|
3 |
6 |
20 % |
|
|
4 and above |
1 |
3.33 % |
|
|
Nil |
6 |
20 % |
|
Duration of breast feeding |
1 Year |
1 |
3.33 % |
|
|
1.5 Year |
2 |
6.67 % |
|
|
2 Year |
27 |
90 % |
|
Age at which weaning started |
3 rd month |
6 |
20 % |
|
Any previous history of infections or infestations for the child |
Yes |
15 |
50 % |
|
No |
15 |
50 % |
|
|
Did the child have any behavioural disorder |
Pica Nail biting |
1 1 |
3.33 % 3.33 % |
|
|
Temper tantrum |
10 |
33.33 % |
|
|
Tics |
1 |
3.33 % |
|
|
Both B and C |
3 |
10 % |
|
|
A, B and C |
1 |
3.33 % |
|
|
Nil |
13 |
43.33 % |
|
Any other nutritional supplementations |
Amrutham powder |
15 |
50 % |
SectionII– Assessment of growth status of preschoolers by using WHO growth charts
Table 2 - Frequency and percentage distribution of preschool children based on height (n = 30)
|
Growth status |
Frequency (f0 |
Percentage (%) |
|
Severe under height |
9 |
30 % |
|
Moderate under height |
10 |
33.33 % |
|
Normal height |
10 |
33.33 % |
|
Severe under weight |
13 |
43.33% |
|
Moderate under weight |
8 |
26.67 % |
|
Normal weight |
9 |
30 % |
|
Severe under mid arm circumference |
1 |
3.34 % |
|
Moderate under mid arm circumference |
7 |
23.33 % |
|
Normal mid arm circumference |
20 |
66.67 % |
|
Moderate over mid arm circumference |
2 |
6.67% |
|
Severe under mid arm circumference |
1 |
3.34 % |
|
Under weight |
14 |
46.66 % |
|
Healthy weight |
16 |
53.33 % |
Section III –Assessment of nutritional status by using Gomez formula.(n=30):
Figure 3 shows that 50 % are having mild malnutrition, 30 % having normal nutrition and remaining 20 % of preschool children having moderate malnutrition
Section IV– Association of growth status of preschool children by using WHO growth chart with selected socio–demographic variables.
Table 3- Association of growth status by means of weight by using WHO growth chart with selected socio–demographic variables.
(n = 30)
|
Variables |
|
Category |
|
|
df |
Chisquare |
Pvalue |
|
|
Severe undr wt |
Modrt undr wt |
Norml wt |
Moderate over wt |
|
|
|
|
Age in year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3–3.5 Years |
4 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
9 |
23.59 |
0.0049* |
|
3.5–4 Years |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
4–4.5 Years |
5 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
4.5–5 Years |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Gender of the child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
5 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
1.442 |
0.695 |
|
Female |
7 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Type of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint family |
5 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0.797 |
0.850 |
|
Nuclear family |
7 |
6 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Income of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below 5000 |
9 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
6 |
6.652 |
0.354 |
|
5001–10000 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
10001–20000 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Occupation of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private employee |
10 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
3 |
0.330 |
0.954 |
|
Home maker |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preterm |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5.676 |
0.128 |
|
Term |
12 |
6 |
8 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Birth order of the child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
4 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
9 |
6.741 |
0.664 |
|
Second |
3 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Third |
3 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Fourth and above |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Number of siblings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
9 |
14.96 |
0.092 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Nil |
5 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Duration of breast feeding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
3.199 |
0.783 |
|
1.5 Years |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
2 Years |
9 |
9 |
8 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Age at which weaning started |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd month |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1.799 |
0.937 |
|
6th month |
8 |
5 |
7 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
9th month |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Any previous history of infections or infestations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
5 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
2.332 |
0.506 |
|
No |
7 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Any behavioural disorders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pica |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
8.525 |
0.482 |
|
Nail biting and temper tantrum |
8 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
A, B, and C |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Nil |
4 |
3 |
6 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Any other nutritional supplementations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amrutham powder |
4 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
20.77 |
0.00011* |
|
Nil |
8 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
Table 3 shows that there is a significant association between weight of the preschool children with age (p value <0.05) and weight of the preschool children with any other nutritional supplementations (p value<0.05).
Section V -Association of growth status by means of height by using WHO growth chart with selected socio–demographic variables.
Table 4- Section deals with the analysis of association between height of preschool children with Age, Gender and Type of the family.
(n = 30)
|
Variables |
|
Category |
|
df |
Chisquare |
Pvalue |
|
|
Sevr undr wt |
Modrt undr wt |
Norm wt |
|
|
|
|
Age in year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3–3.5 Years |
5 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
6.52 |
0.367 |
|
3.5–4 Years |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
4–4.5 Years |
4 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
4.5–5 Years |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Gender of the child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
3 |
3 |
8 |
2 |
4.721 |
0.094 |
|
Female |
7 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Type of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint family |
3 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
20.238 |
0.00004* |
|
Nuclear family |
7 |
5 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Income of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below 5000 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
4.032 |
0.401 |
|
5001–10000 |
3 |
8 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
10001–20000 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Occupation of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private employee |
8 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
5.1 |
0.07 |
|
Home maker |
2 |
4 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preterm |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0.801 |
0.669 |
|
Term |
9 |
8 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
Birth order of the child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
4 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
3.136 |
0.791 |
|
Second |
2 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Third |
2 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Fourth and above |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Number of sibblings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
8.454 |
0.206 |
|
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Nil |
2 |
0 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Duration of breast feeding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
7.743 |
0.101 |
|
1.5 Years |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
2 Years |
8 |
7 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
1.5 Years |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
2 Years |
8 |
7 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
Age at which weaning started |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd month |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
4.046 |
0.399 |
|
6th month |
7 |
4 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
9th month |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Any previous history of infections or infestations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
6 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
0.8 |
0.67 |
|
No |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
Any behavioural disorders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pica |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
12.229 |
0.05 |
|
Nail biting and temper tantrum |
4 |
9 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
A, B, and C |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Nil |
5 |
1 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
Any other nutritional supplementations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amrutham powder |
1 |
7 |
5 |
2 |
8.252 |
0.016* |
|
Nil |
9 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
Table 4 shows that there is a significant association between height of the preschool children with type of the family (p value<0.05) and with nutritional supplementations (p value<0.05).
Section VI- Association of growth status by means of mid arm circumference by using WHO growth chart with selected socio–demographic variables.
Table 5- Section deals with the analysis of association between mid arm circumference of preschool children with Age, Gender and Type of the family. (n = 30)
|
Variables |
|
Category |
|
df |
Chisquare |
Pvalue |
|
|
Sevr undrmidarm circm |
Modrte under circumfernce |
Norml mid arm circumfrnc |
|
|
|
|
Age in year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3–3.5 Years |
1 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
18.654 |
0.0047* |
|
3.5–4 Years |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
4–4.5 Years |
0 |
3 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
4.5–5 Years |
0 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Gender of the child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
0 |
2 |
13 |
3 |
4.09 |
0.129 |
|
Female |
2 |
6 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
Type of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint family |
0 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
1.78 |
0.410 |
|
Nuclear family |
7 |
6 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
Income of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below 5000 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
4 |
17.84 |
0.0013* |
|
5001–10000 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
10001–20000 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Occupation of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private employee |
1 |
5 |
19 |
2 |
1.57 |
0.456 |
|
Home maker |
0 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preterm |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2.44 |
0.295 |
|
Term |
1 |
6 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
Income of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below 5000 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
4 |
17.84 |
0.0013* |
|
5001–10000 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
10001–20000 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Occupation of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private employee |
1 |
5 |
19 |
2 |
1.57 |
0.456 |
|
Birth order of the child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
1 |
3 |
5 |
9 |
4.72 |
0.858 |
|
Second |
0 |
1 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Third |
0 |
3 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
Fourth and above |
0 |
1 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Number of sibblings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
9 |
8.10 |
0.524 |
|
2 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Nil |
1 |
1 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
Duration of breast feeding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
22.02 |
0.00019* |
|
1.5 Years |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 Years |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Age at which weaning started |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd month |
1 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
27.7 |
0.000014* |
|
6th month |
0 |
6 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
9th month |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Any previous history of infections or infestations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
0 |
2 |
13 |
2 |
4.18 |
0.123 |
|
No |
1 |
6 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
Any behavioural disorders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pica |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
43.67 |
0.00001* |
|
Nail biting and temper tantrum |
0 |
4 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
A, B, and C |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Nil |
0 |
4 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
Any other nutritional supplementations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amrutham powder |
0 |
3 |
11 |
2 |
1.86 |
0.394 |
|
Nil |
1 |
5 |
10 |
|
|
|
Table 5 shows that there is a significant association between mid arm circumference of preschool children with age in year (p value<0.05), income of the family (p value<0.05), duartion of breast feeding (pvalue<0.05), age at which weaning started (pvalue <0.05) and any behavioural disorder (pvalue<0.05).
Section VII- Association of growth status by means of BMI by using WHO growth chart with selected socio–demographic variables.
Table 6- Section deals with the analysis of association between BMI of preschool children with Age, Gender and Type of the family.
(n = 30)
|
Variables |
|
Category |
|
|
df |
Chisquare |
Pvalue |
|
|
Sevr undr wt |
Undr wt |
Norml wt |
Ovr wt |
|
|
|
|
Age in year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3–3.5 Years |
1 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
9 |
13.338 |
0.147 |
|
3.5–4 Years |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
4–4.5 Years |
1 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
4.5–5 Years |
0 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Gender of the child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
3 |
4 |
7 |
1 |
3 |
2.73 |
0.435 |
|
Female |
1 |
4 |
10 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Type of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint family |
0 |
4 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
2.3256 |
0.507 |
|
Nuclear family |
2 |
6 |
10 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Income of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below 5000 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
14.3434 |
0.026* |
|
5001–10000 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
10001–20000 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Occupation of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private employee |
4 |
10 |
11 |
0 |
3 |
1.208 |
0.751 |
|
Home maker |
0 |
2 |
13 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preterm |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
10.941 |
0.012* |
|
Term |
5 |
10 |
12 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Birth order of the child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
0 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
9 |
28.503 |
0.000756* |
|
Second |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Third |
1 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Fourth and above |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Number of sibblings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
9 |
18.33 |
0.031* |
|
2 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Nil |
0 |
3 |
6 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Duration of breast feeding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
24.4303 |
0.000435* |
|
1.5 Years |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 Years |
3 |
9 |
13 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Age at which weaning started |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd month |
2 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
9 |
19.053 |
0.024* |
|
6th month |
1 |
10 |
9 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
9th month
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Any previous history of infections or infestations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
1 |
4 |
9 |
1 |
3 |
2.8644 |
0.413 |
|
No |
2 |
7 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Any behavioural disorders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pica |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
18.0651 |
0.034* |
|
Nail biting and temper tantrum |
3 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
A, B, and C |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Nil |
0 |
1 |
10 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Any other nutritional supplementations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amrutham powder |
1 |
6 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
2.3 |
0.512 |
|
Nil |
2 |
5 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
|
Table 6 shows that there is a significant association between BMI of preschool children with income of the family and delivery (pvalue<0.05), birth order of the child, number of siblings and duration of breast feeding (pvalue<0.05), age at which weaning started (pvalue<0.05, any behavioural disorders (pvalue<0.05).
Section VIII –Association of nutritional status of preschool children with selected socio–demographic variables.
Table 7 - Section deals with the analysis of association of nutritional status of preschool children with Age, Gender and Type of the family. (n = 30)
|
Variables |
|
Category |
|
df |
Chisquare |
Pvalue |
|
|
Norml |
Mild |
Modrate |
|
|
|
|
Age in year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3–3.5 Years |
3 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
7.564 |
0.271 |
|
3.5–4 Years |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
4–4.5 Years |
3 |
8 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
4.5–5 Years |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Gender of the child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
6 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
1.732 |
0.420 |
|
Female |
3 |
8 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Type of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint family |
2 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
1.293 |
0.523 |
|
Nuclear family |
7 |
9 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Income of the family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below 5000 |
2 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
6.514 |
0.163 |
|
5001–10000 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
10001–20000 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Occupation of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private employee |
8 |
12 |
5 |
2 |
0.319 |
0.852 |
|
Home maker |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preterm |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1.657 |
0.436 |
|
Term |
8 |
13 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
Birth order of the child |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
3 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
2.955 |
0.814 |
|
Second |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Third |
3 |
7 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Fourth and above |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Number of siblings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
8.926 |
0.177 |
|
2 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Nil |
3 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Duration of breast feeding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year |
0 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
0.832 |
0.934 |
|
1.5 Years |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
2 Years |
9 |
12 |
6 |
|
|
|
Table 7 shows that there is a significant association between nutritional status of preschool children with age at which weasning started (pvalue<0.05)
Table 8- Section deals with the analysis of association between nutritional status of preschool children with Age at which weaning started and any previous history of infection or infestations for the child. (n = 30)
|
Variables |
|
Category |
|
df |
Chisquare |
Pvalue |
|
|
Svr undr wt |
Modrt undr wt |
Norml wt |
|
|
|
|
Age at which weaning started |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd month |
0 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
14.354 |
0.006247* |
|
6th month |
7 |
10 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
9th month |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Any previous history of infections or infestations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
7 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
5.505 |
0.06 |
|
No |
2 |
8 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Any behavioural disorders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pica |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
13.47 |
0.036* |
|
Nail biting and temper tantrum |
4 |
5 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
A, B, and C |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Nil |
4 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Any other nutritional supplementations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amrutham powder |
3 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
1.3192 |
0.517 |
|
Nil |
6 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Any behavioural disorders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pica |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
13.47 |
0.036* |
|
Nail biting and temper tantrum |
4 |
5 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
A, B, and C |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Nil |
4 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Any other nutritional supplementations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amrutham powder |
3 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
1.3192 |
0.517 |
|
Nil |
6 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
|
Table 8 shows that there is a significant association between nutritional status of preschool children with any behavioural disorders (pvalue<0.05).
Section IX –Assessment of effectiveness of motivational song on growth promotion of preschool children
Table 9- Frequency and percentage distribution of preschool children based on effectiveness of motivational song on growth promotion. (n = 30)
|
Variables |
Category |
Frequency (f) |
Percentage (%) |
|
Weight status of the child |
Increased |
5 |
16.67 % |
|
No change |
25 |
83.33 % |
|
|
Ability to recall the song |
Not able to recall |
28 |
93.33 % |
|
Partially able to recall |
2 |
6.66 % |
|
|
Attitude towards the motivational song |
Interested Partially interested |
15 15 |
50 % 50 % |
CONCLUSION:
33.3 % preschool children have normal height and 30% children have severe under height. 30% preschool children have normal weight and 43.33% children have severe under weight, 66.07% preschool children have normal mid arm circumference and 3.34% children have severe under mid arm circumference, 53.33% preschool children have healthy weight, 30% preschool children have normal nutritional status and 80% children have moderate malnutrition, There is a significant association between socio-demographic variables with growth status and nutritional status (pvalue<0.05).
REFERENCE:
1. National Nutrition monitoring Bureau. Reports. Hyderabad: National Institute of Nutrion, Indian Council of Medical Research, 2001.
2. Deaton A, Dreze J.Food and nutrition in India:facts and interpretations.Econ polit Wkly 2009;7:42-65.
3. Maitra P, Rammohan A, Ray R, Robitaille M-C. Food consumption patterns and malnourished Indian children: is there a link? Discussion Paper no. 19/10. Department of Economics, Monash University, 2010.
4. National Nutrition Monitoring Bureau (NNMB). 1979- 2006. NNMB Reports. National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, 2006.
5. Bharati S, Pal M, Bharati P. Determinants of nutritional status of pre-school children in India. J Biosoc Sci 2008; 40:801–14.
Received on 03.03.2020 Modified on 08.04.2020
Accepted on 29.04.2020 ©AandV Publications All right reserved
Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2020; 10(3): 275-282.
DOI: 10.5958/2349-2996.2020.00058.0